I have encountered some unbelievable things over the years and decided to share the latest.
Apologies for the length of the post - lots of info to share.
I bought a non runner 2010 L322 5.0 Supercharged on auction a while ago. (sight unseen). It was/is in incredible shape having only done around 35000 miles since new and is genuinely in showroom condition. Apart from a very broken engine. Once I had it delivered to my place I did some basic troubleshooting to see what made it a non runner. The coolant tank was empty so filled it and then noticed that the coolant was running out of the centre of the crankshaft pulley. Yes really - the crankshaft pulley. Before I investigated further I also had a look down the number 2 plug hole with my endoscope and when I saw that the piston was completely missing, I decided to put the car on ice until I had some spare time.
Last month I finally got busy on the car. I dusted off my spare engine parts which had been sitting waiting for more than a few years and started assembling. I previously had everything machined pending the rebuild. New pistons, bearings, etc, etc, etc, in other words a full overhaul. The engine is now built and the next step is to remove the broken engine so I can harvest the parts that I will fit to the rebuilt engine such as brackets, pipes, etc.
The existing engine is seized so the first job was to removed the lower timing cover to see what the timing chains looked like prior to trying to force the engine to turn so I can get to and remove the torque converter bolts which is necessary before engine removal. I finally discovered what had caused this engine to let go at such a low mileage and you cant make this stuff up.
(I cant say for sure why the previous mechanic did what he did but I am sure my guesses are fairly accurate).
Ok. So apart from the small matter of the missing piston, I discovered a small bolt securing the crank pulley to the crank. The normal bolt has a 24mm head but this one was 19mm. I started to remove it and it just pulled out. (one of my many WTF moments with this car). Now for the reason. The previous mechanic had tried to remove the reverse thread bolt not knowing it is reverse thread. So he carried on tightening it until it snapped. He must have used a very long cheater bar to do that. His next step was to drill a hole in the broken bolt to use an "easy out" which also didn't work - it just screwed the broken bolt further into the crankshaft and then stripped out the hole he had drilled. Luckily there was no longer a bolt holding the pulley onto the crank so he managed to remove it to continue with the main job that he was tasked to do. And I am sure that job was to replace the original tensioners and guides with the updated versions. Why this was necessary at 35000 miles is beyond me but lets not worry about that. He decided that only the hydraulic tensioners needed replacing so fitted them and used the original guides. That was the nail in the coffin for this engine. One can see from the photos why you should not do this. The updated tensioners HAVE to be used with the updated guides due to a change in angle of the tensioners. Anyway our intrepid mecahnic then refitted the timing covers and used the strongest glue he could find to ensure a leak free job. I wish I knew what was used because I want some. Possibly JB Weld. I had to chisel the lower cover off.
And his final solution (which is what any self respecting mechanic would have done) was to refit the pulley using the biggest hammer he could find and then weld the pulley to the end of the crankshaft. To top it off he glued the smaller bolt into the hole to make it look pretty. (fortunately for me his welding skills were as hopeless as his spannering skills so I was able to break the welds with very little effort in order to remove the pulley).
I imagine the engine lasted less than 100 miles before it let go but whatever the distance, it was guaranteed to happen sooner rather than later. I am sure some members here get tired of my continual rants about "poor maintenance" but it is scary what is done by incompetent morons and I wouldn't mind betting that the previous owner swore to never own another Land Rover due to his engine failing at such a low mileage and I also bet that he shared this unreliability with as many people as possible.
Apologies for the length of the post - lots of info to share.
I bought a non runner 2010 L322 5.0 Supercharged on auction a while ago. (sight unseen). It was/is in incredible shape having only done around 35000 miles since new and is genuinely in showroom condition. Apart from a very broken engine. Once I had it delivered to my place I did some basic troubleshooting to see what made it a non runner. The coolant tank was empty so filled it and then noticed that the coolant was running out of the centre of the crankshaft pulley. Yes really - the crankshaft pulley. Before I investigated further I also had a look down the number 2 plug hole with my endoscope and when I saw that the piston was completely missing, I decided to put the car on ice until I had some spare time.
Last month I finally got busy on the car. I dusted off my spare engine parts which had been sitting waiting for more than a few years and started assembling. I previously had everything machined pending the rebuild. New pistons, bearings, etc, etc, etc, in other words a full overhaul. The engine is now built and the next step is to remove the broken engine so I can harvest the parts that I will fit to the rebuilt engine such as brackets, pipes, etc.
The existing engine is seized so the first job was to removed the lower timing cover to see what the timing chains looked like prior to trying to force the engine to turn so I can get to and remove the torque converter bolts which is necessary before engine removal. I finally discovered what had caused this engine to let go at such a low mileage and you cant make this stuff up.
(I cant say for sure why the previous mechanic did what he did but I am sure my guesses are fairly accurate).
Ok. So apart from the small matter of the missing piston, I discovered a small bolt securing the crank pulley to the crank. The normal bolt has a 24mm head but this one was 19mm. I started to remove it and it just pulled out. (one of my many WTF moments with this car). Now for the reason. The previous mechanic had tried to remove the reverse thread bolt not knowing it is reverse thread. So he carried on tightening it until it snapped. He must have used a very long cheater bar to do that. His next step was to drill a hole in the broken bolt to use an "easy out" which also didn't work - it just screwed the broken bolt further into the crankshaft and then stripped out the hole he had drilled. Luckily there was no longer a bolt holding the pulley onto the crank so he managed to remove it to continue with the main job that he was tasked to do. And I am sure that job was to replace the original tensioners and guides with the updated versions. Why this was necessary at 35000 miles is beyond me but lets not worry about that. He decided that only the hydraulic tensioners needed replacing so fitted them and used the original guides. That was the nail in the coffin for this engine. One can see from the photos why you should not do this. The updated tensioners HAVE to be used with the updated guides due to a change in angle of the tensioners. Anyway our intrepid mecahnic then refitted the timing covers and used the strongest glue he could find to ensure a leak free job. I wish I knew what was used because I want some. Possibly JB Weld. I had to chisel the lower cover off.
And his final solution (which is what any self respecting mechanic would have done) was to refit the pulley using the biggest hammer he could find and then weld the pulley to the end of the crankshaft. To top it off he glued the smaller bolt into the hole to make it look pretty. (fortunately for me his welding skills were as hopeless as his spannering skills so I was able to break the welds with very little effort in order to remove the pulley).
I imagine the engine lasted less than 100 miles before it let go but whatever the distance, it was guaranteed to happen sooner rather than later. I am sure some members here get tired of my continual rants about "poor maintenance" but it is scary what is done by incompetent morons and I wouldn't mind betting that the previous owner swore to never own another Land Rover due to his engine failing at such a low mileage and I also bet that he shared this unreliability with as many people as possible.