Range Rovers Forum banner

Brake issues- Why isnt this becoming a class action suit?

13K views 81 replies 39 participants last post by  Royalist  
#1 · (Edited)
I'm dealing with the same brake issues as everyone else. I took my truck to Rahal Land rover in april of this year at 9K my brakes started vibrating bad. I took my rover in and was told that I needed new brakes and Rotors. What they didnt tell me was that they only meant the front brakes and rotors..So when i got the 2800 bill I assumed they were all replaced (clearly my fault for not reading the invoice). What I found odd was that they did mention the rear steering and how it caused premature brake wear. I guess I assumed that meant they were replacing all of them.

Well fast forward to this weekend. I'm just over 15k miles and all of a sudden my brake pad lights comes on. Again!

I called the dealer to confirm what I already suspected. Yes, they only replaced the front brakes. Apparently I blacked out for a few minutes because I came to while berating this poor service manager. He stated that he used to work at mercedes and that I should see how much worse they are... I immediately called BS and told him that I had just traded my 21' G63 with 30k miles and never had brake issues... Now Its a another 1900 down the drain for Rotors and Pads. I also asked if they would just do the pads so I can turn around and dump the car. Their response was, "no" we do not replace pads without replacing rotors because we can't guarantee that they wont squeal. Really?!
I live in western PA. We don't have a lot of luxury car dealers so they hammer you when they can. I have owned every brand from Ferrari, Lamborghini, Bentley, Rolls, Etc. and I've never had this horrible of an experience with brakes. Maybe I'm fortunate, who knows?


Regardless, I'm wondering why this hasn't gained more traction in our community? I'm so utterly disappointed in JLR that I'm ready to give up on the brand.

Rant over-
 
#33 ·
Oh my god I am just seening this chat right now. My Range Rover sport 2024 is not even a year old and I had to replace my brakes and brake pads and had to pay out of licked about $2300-$3000. My husband blamed me for not knowing how to drive and that I press my brakes really hard. But I also had a 2017 Range Rover and I changed the brake pads at like 30,000 miles. I live in Chicago. So this isn’t normal , you guys are saying
 

Attachments

#5 ·
I just spoke to my Indy shop owner about this couple days ago. He said labor is about $150-$200 plus the cost of the pads. They even figured out how to retract electronic parking brake without using any software device. Clearly something is wrong with LR brake system. It's not normal to replace brakes every 9K-10K miles.
 
#6 ·
I'm dealing with the same brake issues as everyone else. I took my truck to Rahal Land rover in april of this year at 9K my brakes started vibrating bad. I took my rover in and was told that I needed new brakes and Rotors. What they didnt tell me was that they only meant the front brakes and rotors..So when i got the 2800 bill I assumed they were all replaced (clearly my fault for not reading the invoice). What I found odd was that they did mention the rear steering and how it caused premature brake wear. I guess I assumed that meant they were replacing all of them.

Well fast forward to this weekend. I'm just over 15k miles and all of a sudden my brake pad lights comes on. Again!

I called the dealer to confirm what I already suspected. Yes, they only replaced the front brakes. Apparently I blacked out for a few minutes because I came to while berating this poor service manager. He stated that he used to work at mercedes and that I should see how much worse they are... I immediately called BS and told him that I had just traded my 21' G63 with 30k miles and never had brake issues... Now Its a another 1900 down the drain for Rotors and Pads. I also asked if they would just do the pads so I can turn around and dump the car. Their response was, "no" we do not replace pads without replacing rotors because we can't guarantee that they wont squeal. Really?!
I live in western PA. We don't have a lot of luxury car dealers so they hammer you when they can. I have owned every brand from Ferrari, Lamborghini, Bentley, Rolls, Etc. and I've never had this horrible of an experience with brakes. Maybe I'm fortunate, who knows?


Regardless, I'm wondering why this hasn't gained more traction in our community? I'm so utterly disappointed in JLR that I'm ready to give up on the brand.

Rant over-
What model?
 
#10 ·
Hi Colo-Rover,

Are you sure this problem only occurs when the "capability plus pack" is present? That would already be a very useful information...at least for those who have yet to order the car.

Considerations:

1) Some write that the brake wear problem depends on the all-wheel steering, which is standard in all L460s. However, it seems strange to me and I don't understand how the rear wheels that steer by some degrees can cause brake wear.

2) The capability plus pack contains the active roll stabilization system. This should also have no influence on the brakes.

3) If the LR documentation is correct, torque vectoring by braking is always present in the L460, even without the capability plus pack. The difference is that there are two types of differentials, the mechanical "open" type as standard, and the electronic one included in the capability plus pack.

Could it be this electronic differential that causes the most brake wear? I mean, maybe when the electronic differential is present, then the torque vectoring works more aggressively and wears the brakes more?
 
#14 ·
Well, at almost 20k we now have the amber brake light for wear, second time through this mess. Should be surprised as we were between 9-10k miles the first go round. This will be the end for us.

Agree rear steer is unlikely to be a cause. Torque vectoring, traction control (for those of us in snowy climates), and hyperactive collision preconditioning are my guesses. Poorly calibrated, typical soft JLR pads, and now low copper content make it worse. I would imagine those in hilly / mountainous areas like us likely have it worse. Routinely we will get that warped/hot rotor judder when coming down long descents. That means overheating and accelerated wear especially with lower / zero copper content. (Side note is that I saw an article somewhere stating that the content of these metals will be further limited in 2025, will see if j can find it.)

It’s a shame as we really like the car otherwise. It’s just inexcusable to have this happen at such low mileage. The braking / traction control system is clearly the weakest link.
 
#15 ·
Well, at almost 20k we now have the amber brake light for wear, second time through this mess. Should be surprised as we were between 9-10k miles the first go round. This will be the end for us.

Agree rear steer is unlikely to be a cause. Torque vectoring, traction control (for those of us in snowy climates), and hyperactive collision preconditioning are my guesses. Poorly calibrated, typical soft JLR pads, and now low copper content make it worse. I would imagine those in hilly / mountainous areas like us likely have it worse. Routinely we will get that warped/hot rotor judder when coming down long descents. That means overheating and accelerated wear especially with lower / zero copper content. (Side note is that I saw an article somewhere stating that the content of these metals will be further limited in 2025, will see if j can find it.)

It’s a shame as we really like the car otherwise. It’s just inexcusable to have this happen at such low mileage. The braking / traction control system is clearly the weakest link.
Sorry to hear. I told myself if it happened to me every 10k I’d get out of mine as well, I love it but that’s just absurd
 
#19 ·
not torque vectoring. it is by design the car is specced to brake rears more aggressively for some reason. that's why the rears have brake dust while the front ones have very little. all these trucks are affected but some worse depending on driving habits (which are not an excuse). most dealers are shaking owner pockets for the rotors with varying excuses, advantaging owner ignorance.

perhaps someone here is an attorney and can get the ball rolling. i am keeping my receipts. eventually there will be a brake recall for under 12-k or 12000 miles i predict and to avoid future issues they will reprogram the braking system if possible. if it is more involved than that they will have to provide a complex reimbursement % protocol for the lifetime of the vehicle. it is indeed by industry standards not acceptable- like i said. pads are one thing- but rotors should last a mini 24 months with very aggressive driving.

they should offer CC brakes on these machines as an option. problem solved.
 
#24 ·
I'm dealing with the same brake issues as everyone else. I took my truck to Rahal Land rover in april of this year at 9K my brakes started vibrating bad. I took my rover in and was told that I needed new brakes and Rotors. What they didnt tell me was that they only meant the front brakes and rotors..So when i got the 2800 bill I assumed they were all replaced (clearly my fault for not reading the invoice). What I found odd was that they did mention the rear steering and how it caused premature brake wear. I guess I assumed that meant they were replacing all of them.

Well fast forward to this weekend. I'm just over 15k miles and all of a sudden my brake pad lights comes on. Again!

I called the dealer to confirm what I already suspected. Yes, they only replaced the front brakes. Apparently I blacked out for a few minutes because I came to while berating this poor service manager. He stated that he used to work at mercedes and that I should see how much worse they are... I immediately called BS and told him that I had just traded my 21' G63 with 30k miles and never had brake issues... Now Its a another 1900 down the drain for Rotors and Pads. I also asked if they would just do the pads so I can turn around and dump the car. Their response was, "no" we do not replace pads without replacing rotors because we can't guarantee that they wont squeal. Really?!
I live in western PA. We don't have a lot of luxury car dealers so they hammer you when they can. I have owned every brand from Ferrari, Lamborghini, Bentley, Rolls, Etc. and I've never had this horrible of an experience with brakes. Maybe I'm fortunate, who knows?


Regardless, I'm wondering why this hasn't gained more traction in our community? I'm so utterly disappointed in JLR that I'm ready to give up on the brand.

Rant over-
The rapid brake wear people have been discussing was on the rears. If the OP complained about vibration was the replacement of fronts to resolve the warped rotors and not pad wear? How many millimeters of thickness was remaining on the front pads?

Did the OP find out if the recent brake indicator light at 15K miles was for the rears or fronts?

There is high wear on the rears due to the brake bias setup but that's also why they stop incredibly well for something that weighs north of 3.5 tons.

I replaced my rears at 20K miles (33K km) and now just did the rears a second time at 35K miles (56K km) with the pads at 3mm (could have waited for the light to come on but I was already in for an oil change). That's still way sooner than on anything else I've owned, but the original front pads are still going strong, think they said only half way down.
 
#63 ·
The rear brakes are also applied separately when using the adaptive cruise control (ACC) to slow the vehicle, especially with the distance is set to minimal before the cruise control backs you off of the set speed. So that could be one factor for owners with ACC that use it frequently.
 
#26 ·
Kinetic energy is a function of V^2, the energy at 120 mph is four times of the energy at 60 mph. Slowing from 120-70 is going to dissipate about thrice the energy compared to going from 60 to a dead stop. So yes, doing multiple back to back stops at those speeds could warp the rotors, especially if they got water splashed on them while braking.
 
#32 ·
2024 P400 and I am down to 7mm all around at 9800 miles. They call that a green check...I call it excessive wear BS. I am sure I will lose.

PS - there is a reason its one of the only two items listed in the warranty that they will cover in first year (brake pads and windshield wipers)...they good well know there is an issue.
 
#38 ·
I’m at 50k and just buying my third set of r
Running into this issue as well. Rears were replaced at 18k. Now I'm getting pulsing from somewhere when applying the brakes. Recommending to replace all 4 corners.
6mm up front and 8mm in the back.
$5k in CA
what model do you have?

eplacements. Just doesn’t seem fair or right …. Has anyone gotten any traction from LRNA?
what model do you have?
 
#39 ·
Modern performance vehicles apply more rear brake than front as an anti dive measure. The rears are much smaller so less rotor surface and less meat on rears cause the wear. This is obvious by looking through the wheels. My Jaguar dealer tried pulling the same BS wanting $700 to replace the rear pads only due to the low miles. I am not willing to win the service customer of the month, so I passed on that trophy. There is no profit on car sales, it’s all about parts and service income. Dealers here in south Florida are at a new record 300+ per hour and they love to sell parts to the unsuspecting rich customers.
 
#41 ·
With the weight of RR SWB and LWB, and the Sports …. They should all have ceramic discs and pads. I still have my 20 Bentayga W12 signature it’s now got 415K miles on it and I extended the warranty 3 more years w/unlimited miles… my point is , it’s got the biggest rotors on it of any SUV on the market even today , they are steel & ceramic composite … I drive very aggressively every time i drive and left lane hoggers get to see a blue blur as I pass them on the right with the horn blaring At triple digits … I’ve gotten 75-90K miles out of the pads and rotors and when I do use the brakes it’s very hard. No warping no issues.

Now when I get the 25 SV LWB , and start driving that …. I know with the old school bembro staels … I’ll need to order front and a rear sets every 6 months because they are complete garbage. LRUK/LRUS should be putting carbon ceramics rotors and pads on all sports and full size rovers PERIOD. They last longer and to stop these 6,7,8K lb Pigs… i mean rigs we need better brake equipment.
 
#42 ·
With the weight of RR SWB and LWB, and the Sports …. They should all have ceramic discs and pads. I still have my 20 Bentayga W12 signature it’s now got 415K miles on it and I extended the warranty 3 more years w/unlimited miles… my point is , it’s got the biggest rotors on it of any SUV on the market even today , they are steel & ceramic composite … I drive very aggressively every time i drive and left lane hoggers get to see a blue blur as I pass them on the right with the horn blaring At triple digits … I’ve gotten 75-90K miles out of the pads and rotors and when I do use the brakes it’s very hard. No warping no issues.

Now when I get the 25 SV LWB , and start driving that …. I know with the old school bembro staels … I’ll need to order front and a rear sets every 6 months because they are complete garbage. LRUK/LRUS should be putting carbon ceramics rotors and pads on all sports and full size rovers PERIOD. They last longer and to stop these 6,7,8K lb Pigs… i mean rigs we need better brake equipment.
True enough, carbon ceramic brakes would increase lifetime considerably. However, such a solution starts at about $15k, which is more than 10% of the cost of most of the big boy Range Rovers. They work fine on my Ferrari but don't seem to fit the niche of Range Rover overall (maybe fine in SV).