If your not an automotive journalist, you should be one....very observant remarks and on the spot with my ownership experience (where similar).
maxwell said:wow...cant believe cali dealers are still that tight with prices. With the 2011's coming out in a few months, and in this economy. My va dealer will knock 4k off any 2010 before you negotiate anything...
http://landroveralexandria.net/CouponView.asp?cid=60
JetPilot said:I went to two dealerships before I pulled the trigger. Both gave me the same story … Land Rover does not discount anymore … it’s not like it used to be … they have cut production by 50%. My sales guy told me he brought a deal to his manager for $600.00 off and got yelled at.
The day I knew my sales guy was off I went in to see the Sales Manager and ended up getting $7,840.00 off list (has every option but rear entertainment). I had a print out of his cost and it was a take it or leave it deal so there was nothing to negotiate.
The only stipulation was it had to be a factory order as he would not let his ‘limited stock’ go for that tight a deal which was fine with me.
If you go on autotrader.com there are US dealers with 20 in stock.
Here is the break down to give you an idea.
CANADIAN $ LIST COST
2010 Range Rover Supercharged 87,400.00 78,660.00
Freight 1,270.00 1,270.00
Optional equipment selected
GREEN LEVY (-GAS) 3,000.00 3,000.00
REAR SEAT ENTERTAINMENT PKG 2,750.00 2,448.00
EXTENDED LEATHER PKG 1,250.00 1,113.00
REAR DIFFERENTIAL LOCK (DIF) 650.00 579.00
20" 5 SPOKE ALLOY WHEELS - STYLE 7 1,200.00 1,068.00
ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (ADC) 800.00 2,492.00
SURROUND CAMERA SYSTEM 990.00 881.00
Speaking only for myself my entire life I've had this thing for "bells & whistles" over uber-performance. So for me to by the SC with all that I want, I'd end up paying $10-$15 grand more. So (for me) it's still cheaper to go with the HSE.bhill03 said:Never understood why people buy HSE's then spend money on Supercharged-like options.
True. However in fairness, the data per the article is based on 2007 MY vehicles. I think there (may) have been more issues with LR back then and/or becasue the RRS was still a "brand new" model in 2006-07 more people were making complaints.gooseyloosey said:From today's release of the latest JD Power. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a6vimtbt2YqQ
"Tata Motors Ltd.’s Land Rover had 255 problems per 100 vehicles, the worst score in the study." :doh:
Maybe you guys can use it to negotiate a better deal.![]()
Sure JD Power is a bit whacked, but if you're dead last even due to some bias, there's little argument that somehow, you don't have a bit of a problem.
CA, like you did, I own a 2008 and ditto, its been a very reliable vehicle. But based on this forum, I think what happens with LR is that you either get a good one, or one that's been made the day after a big Brit holiday and beset with problems. For every vehicle with only 0-1 problem (me, you), there's another with 4 problems. It's really a crapshoot. I give them some leeway since most other brands don't come with all the gizmos that LR's do (i.e., compressors, etc.). Plus there's more of a customer learning curve as well...but geez, last place?CA-SPORT said:True. However in fairness, the data per the article is based on 2007 MY vehicles. I think there (may) have been more issues with LR back then and/or becasue the RRS was still a "brand new" model in 2006-07 more people were making complaints.gooseyloosey said:From today's release of the latest JD Power. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a6vimtbt2YqQ
"Tata Motors Ltd.’s Land Rover had 255 problems per 100 vehicles, the worst score in the study." :doh:
Maybe you guys can use it to negotiate a better deal.![]()
Sure JD Power is a bit whacked, but if you're dead last even due to some bias, there's little argument that somehow, you don't have a bit of a problem.
As the former owner of a 2008 & now 2010 I've never had a single problem and have always given LR a great rating when contacted by JD Power.
:thumb: