avus said:
first off -- i always love the Freudian-slip young couples use in referring to their other as their Finance...
back on topic --
the GX is just a reskinned Toyota 4Runner -- exact same mechanicals, and some of the same switchgear
thus the cheap feel it gives off
i, for one, don't understand the appeal of lexus. they're basically overpriced rebadged Toyotas
Land Rovers have character - you noticed it in your review.
if sewing machine dependability is what you are wanting get the lexus - if you want an engaging relationship with your suv, get the land rover
lol, finance...she will be reading this post later... :doh:
I do not know how to multi-quote, but thank you for all who have responded thusfar. Sorry for making posts so long...I have a lot on my mind when it comes to the purchase of the RRS. I will try and answer questions in this post. For those that I miss, unless I figure out how to multi-quote, I will go back and answer them individually.
I've been part of the Lexus family for the last 8 years and I currently own an 06 IS 350. I tend to buy cars and keep them for 3.5 to 4 years, unless something comes out and I feel that I absolutely have to have it (2010 RRS). The RRS meets all of our requirements: family(max (4)):check; price:check; looks (interior/exterior):check; functionality:check; quality:check, etc., etc. Besides that, it has its own presence/soul, unlike the Lexus GX 460, which tries to be many things, but ends up being uninspiring. The only things that I question was the reliability and gas mileage; however, at this point we are prepared to deal with both.
Speaking of reliability, Lexus/Toyota reliability is not all it is cracked up to being (IMO). I've had many problems (all fixed under warranty) all cars do (in my experience), it is a matter of what I am willing to deal with, and how the shop/dealer goes about fixing those problems. I spoke to the Land Rover tech and to me it sounded like the techs could not handle the technology that Land Rover puts in their SUVs. Also, the leadership and engine types have changed (BMW to Jaguar/Rover), this will affect the techs being able to keep up with what is going on? I don't know, just guessing. For piece of mind, I plan on buying an extended (Land Rover) warranty.
At this point my competitors: the MB GL (too expensive optioned out; no off-road) and Lexus GX 460 (expensive and not worth it), Audi Q7 (not worth it 4.2L, no off-road); Cayenne (to expensive) are not in the running. Am I over-justifying my purchase; yes. The RRS is equally as expensive and I will most likely not be taking it off-road or outrunning tanks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wKfpPrRVIo. My order for the RRS has been placed, but I was wondering about the RRS SC or base RR. My fiancé cannot stand exterior of the Range Rover; however, I love it and the interior (I like the exterior of the sport more). The RRS SC is overkill...I like overkill, but don't need it. Decisions, decisions... As it stands right now, I'm joining the Land Rover family (RRS HSE/LUX). Jury is still out on whether it's the RRS SC or Range Rover. Did anyone else have these types of obstacles; what helped you decide?