One is two years newer than the other.famousRRSS said:
One is two years newer than the other.famousRRSS said:Hello fellow board members. I'm on the market for a range rover sports supercharged and I'm debating on the 2006 or the 2008. Can you guys let me know your input on this please thanks
UK - you and gooseyloosey crack me up....Ukraine Range said:One is two years newer than the other.famousRRSS said:Hello fellow board members. I'm on the market for a range rover sports supercharged and I'm debating on the 2006 or the 2008. Can you guys let me know your input on this please thanks
UK - you and gooseyloosey crack me up....[/quote:27xg3exv]BWB RRS HSE said:[quote="Ukraine Range":27xg3exv]One is two years newer than the other.famousRRSS said:Hello fellow board members. I'm on the market for a range rover sports supercharged and I'm debating on the 2006 or the 2008. Can you guys let me know your input on this please thanks
Yes but read the by laws in fine print it says 'no stupid questions'cameradude said:i thought this forum was for owners who needed help regarding their vehicles? that's what forums are for people!
Who am I? I'm common sense, I guess we've never met.cameradude said:who are you to decide what's stupid and what's not?
EXACTLY. If this guy had said "I know the differences between an '06 and '08 are very minor, but I'm having a hard time deciding whether or not to spend more with less miles or spend less with more miles", the responses would have been far more positive. I mean, you're coming to an automotive forum, dress the part.BWB RRS HSE said:Yes - the original thread question is analogous to "vanilla or chocolate?" with the response being "yes".
I am a firm believer in doing a little thinking before opening one''s mouth...or typing.
Not trying to be critcal, just evaluative and courteous.