My experiance was awful. Atleast from my side dont pull the trigger.
Nice looks but bad QC and service.
Nice looks but bad QC and service.
I find your post quite lacking; not just the typo's but lack of specifics.....PRSC said:My experiance was awful. Atleast from my side dont pull the trigger.
Nice looks but bad QC and service.
BWB RRS HSE said:I find your post quite lacking; not just the typo's but lack of specifics.....PRSC said:My experiance was awful. Atleast from my side dont pull the trigger.
Nice looks but bad QC and service.
My 2010 RRS HSE is by far the best vehicle I have ever owned. I have had zero issues in 3,600 miles. What's not to love?![]()
Ohhh - so you post a reply with no specifics and tell a potential buyer to NOT BUY and I am supposed to search your posts to find out where you are coming from. I'll remember that in the future.....PRSC said:Ha Ha I also didnt kow this was a grammer contest. Most of the time my write ups are done from my iphone so its something I done pay too much attention to.
Anyways my write ups are all true. Again this is just my opinion! Each person has their own,. This is my second Range Rover Sport and my first never gave me any trouble in the past but the 2010 has given me trouble.
My specifics include photos and a brief write up. I find that enough for those who can see and read.
I agree - their quality would be better for sure.....swimmingriver said:I wish Land Rover was as focused on QC as you are on TYPOS.
PRSC said:Ha Ha I also didnt kow this was a grammer contest.
Sorry, us Brits do so love irony...
"Grammar"
Sorry Raab...that would be "We" Brits, as in nominative plural, the subject of the sentence, but you're right on target with the grammar.Raab said:PRSC said:Ha Ha I also didnt kow this was a grammer contest.
Sorry, us Brits do so love irony...
"Grammar"
Effeminate: (of a man or boy) having traits, tastes, habits, etc., traditionally considered feminine, as softness or delicacy. :mrgreen:Raab said:Ok, back on topic…
I thought the initial link was very good, particularly the comment about the 4.2SC Supercharger whine sounding like Mad Max – I wish I had thought of that 4 years ago rather than spend the whole time bemoaning the fact that it sounded rather effeminate. On refletcion it did sound like Mad Max, and now I like it much more in retrospect than I did at the time.
Overall personal perspective:
’06 SC – bulletproof, brilliant in every way, $40 to remove the resonator best $$/mod value anywhere.
’10 SC – not quite so bulletproof but better in every way than the ’06, apart for the resonator removal causing cannon fire and scaring the neighbours.
The way I see it the ball was dropped at least 3 times by LR on your car w the door misalignment. The factory, the import inspection, and the dealer. All had an opportunity to correct that before you had to deal with it.PRSC said:I agree. At this point I see the 06'-09' better than 10'. We will have to see the 11' but at this point I think I will not be purchasing any more LR in the near future because of QC!
Quite correct, it’s a very different sound in the ‘10. Nothing at all until 3000rpm and then a “knocking” noise, which has the overall effect of making the engine note deeper. Cuts in and out very sharply. it's actually not great, IMHO.AppleChilli said:From what I've read the 2010 does not have the Mad Max trait.
I see that you removed your resonator?! Was that to make it sound louder? best $$/mod value; how so?
Thanks for catching that. Been living in The Colonies for too long.PJPR01 said:Sorry Raab...that would be "We" Brits, as in nominative plural, the subject of the sentence, but you're right on target with the grammar.Raab said:PRSC said:Ha Ha I also didnt kow this was a grammer contest.
Sorry, us Brits do so love irony...
"Grammar"
Oh the irony!!!
`) `)