I have been a long time lurker, longtime reader/follower of this particular forum as well as the resource that is rr.net. My wife's vehicle is a 2005 MKIII Adriatic Blue w/54K; she loves it as do I. Can go through hell & back. That said, my vehicle is a 2002 Toyota 4Runner. Now, don't get me wrong, I will always rather drive the Rover but I've but in maybe ~$3K into the 4Runner (not counting oil changes & tires) which, conversly, I have over 117,000 miles on it. In comparison with our Rover which is actually a CPO until 75K and/or 4/2011 but still that's quite a difference as the cost of ownership of a Rover is substancial, but I digress. It is worth it, really is. Wonderful to drive, safe as can be/like a tank & has a refined elegance that is both attractive + unique as the vehicle is able to handle tough Michigan winters, two-tracking in the middle of Canada at -13 but also deliver you to work with a grin on your face.
Our Land Rover dealer, where we live in Michigan, USA, told us that they recommend we replace the hoses; I believe the hoses are coolant (~$1,100K) + the oil separator hoses ($200). Wouldn't you know it the hoses are not covered under warranty. When I took the truck in, it was for a routine oil change, granted, it's 15K miles or once every year but times are tough here so I wonder if this is something more like very preventative routine maintenance or is this something that could be more or less 70K miles or a year or so later? That said, I wonder if this is associated in any capacity to the PCV hose issue as explained in detail here: http://rangerovers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=28533 ? If so, I used the superb guide from dan_uk_1984 to at least be informed about what appears to be a rather obvious mechanical/engineering/product/material choice oversight. I took a picture of our Rover's hoses; click here if you would like to see for comparison (hose looks & feels malleable but is not leaking - that I can see, I looked): http://collectiveunconscious.org/DSC_1280.jpg
This is a pick of the engine w/the acoustic cover (I believe that is what the shell is referred to as) off: http://collectiveunconscious.org/DSC_1279.jpg Does anyone know which hoses my dealer may be referring to? I have been respectful throughout all of our interactions, however, I have yet to hear back about my inquiry as to the question I just posed from said dealer. Any ideas?
Peace
Our Land Rover dealer, where we live in Michigan, USA, told us that they recommend we replace the hoses; I believe the hoses are coolant (~$1,100K) + the oil separator hoses ($200). Wouldn't you know it the hoses are not covered under warranty. When I took the truck in, it was for a routine oil change, granted, it's 15K miles or once every year but times are tough here so I wonder if this is something more like very preventative routine maintenance or is this something that could be more or less 70K miles or a year or so later? That said, I wonder if this is associated in any capacity to the PCV hose issue as explained in detail here: http://rangerovers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=28533 ? If so, I used the superb guide from dan_uk_1984 to at least be informed about what appears to be a rather obvious mechanical/engineering/product/material choice oversight. I took a picture of our Rover's hoses; click here if you would like to see for comparison (hose looks & feels malleable but is not leaking - that I can see, I looked): http://collectiveunconscious.org/DSC_1280.jpg
This is a pick of the engine w/the acoustic cover (I believe that is what the shell is referred to as) off: http://collectiveunconscious.org/DSC_1279.jpg Does anyone know which hoses my dealer may be referring to? I have been respectful throughout all of our interactions, however, I have yet to hear back about my inquiry as to the question I just posed from said dealer. Any ideas?
Peace