EAS P38 Lift Using Recalibration
Hardy Neale's Approach
Introduction
Early Experiments with
Recalibration
Final "Stage II" EAS
System
Chris Compton's
Experience
Musings on
Alternative
Approaches
Introduction
Hardy
Neale has pioneered another method of lifting the air suspension --
using recalibration of height settings. He was the first to try a
method of getting more lift out of air suspension models that is purely
electronic -- you can change the default height settings in the air
suspension's ECU using the TestBook or the aftermarket equivalents now
available at much lower cost.
(Photo
at right: Hardy's 4.0 with 265/75R16
tires and recalibration lift
in High Profile mode)
Early Experimentation with Electronic
Recalibration Method
Hardy reported in 2003 that some time ago he
read with great interest the article on Rangeroves.net on extended
profile selection
& re-calibrating the height settings. He had since had
the height settings on his '99 4.0 EAS re-set
by Rick's 4WD as follows:
Freeway - default
Standard - 15mm higher (room for Cooper ST 255/70 x 16 tyres)
High - 30mm higher, the full whack - emulates emergency extended
setting.
Extended - default
The procedure did not even involve setting blocks under axles etc --
Hardy's mechanic simply plugged his computer (Autologic, not LR
testbook) in
and increased
existing settings by above values in 5 minutes with the car parked in
the driveway. "Each airbag has a specified setting for the different
heights; I just asked Rick to increase the existing values by 15 and 25
mm."
Hardy reports having no troubles since -- and this method does bypass
the
problem with the EAS bypass circuit I developed in that you cannot
accidentally go higher than the standard "Extended" mode and run the
risk of popping the bags. Hardy reports his friends are rather
impressed with his extra lift selectable at the press of a button --
his "high" mode is over 2.5 inches above the default "standard"
setting.
At these extreme height settings, ride quality and articulation do
deteriorate noticeably, so the particular tradeoff you use is up to
you. As always, use at your own risk!!
Chris Crompton's Experience
Chris Crompton
of the UAE found in January '04 that his dealer could not do this procedure with
the standard Testbook, so it may be necessary in that case to "fool" the
Testbook during the calibration procedure by adding a shim to each of the blocks
used between the axle and chassis to calibrate the height.
"Stage II" EAS Modifications
As noted above, Hardy initially got his mechanic to dial in a lift in
the normal and
off road settings of his RR. After trying this for a while, he
experimented with putting the bags from the longer rear springs on the
front to allow higher settings (see photo below).
.
|
|
|
Rear spring bellows with its longer bottom piston fitted to front axle. Note this shot is at maximum ride height, but there is still some travel left in the air spring. |
For the rear, Hardy found that new aftermarket rear
bellows were longer than OEM (see pictures on Air Spring
Bellows Replacement Page) so he used these. Testing the
articulation without the rear shocks connected he found he could get
about another 2 inches at the shock mounts. However his search for
longer shocks proved fruitless so for now he left the stock rear shocks
in place. In the new higher
settings he chose (see below) this only allows a couple of inches of
axle droop, a problem that may be addressed later. Meanwhile Hardy notes "I've
heard some concern over standard airsprings ripping off mounts when
vehicle is jacked by chassis instead of axle.On my vehicle (std
shockies and longer springs) this cannot happen."
He also considered lifting the rear further using spacers, and even made some
up. However in the
absence of a solution to the shock problem, this aspect was put on
hold.
Meanwhile,
Hardy replaced the 255//70 tires he had been using with 265/75s, and
had new lower ratio 4.1 ring and pinion gears from Great Basin Rovers
installed to compensate for the larger tire size (see page on air supply for locker and tire
inflation). With the new longer springs front and rear, Hardy was
able to get the EAS reprogrammed again to higher settings commensurate
with the new tires and gears. The final settings were as follows:
Standard height is still 15mm higher than factory.
High Profile height is now
50mm higher than the new std height - that is it goes up another 2"
when the "High Profile" rocker switch is activated.
Hardy reports "So with new max height
setting combined with longer airsprings all round (old rears in front,
new longers in rear) and the new tires (Cooper
ST 265/75 tyres, no longer 255/70) the car
is quite well behaved and comfortable on bumps. There is still only about 2-3" travel droop
left at max height (thanks to use of standard shocks) so I still only
use this setting when I really have to. But when I do hit the
EAS off road button, I now have 4" of additional chassis clearance over
std RR at std height.
(65mm from
EAS plus extra 35mm from 265/75 tyres).
"The new larger tires fit
beautifully, just rubbing slightly on the inside of front
mudflaps while turning on driveway gutters etc.
Freeway mode works fine too, just
rubs a little more while turning on bumps (time to go up).
The plan was to go with
255/85 but I chickened out, preferring to preserve the RR good
manners somewhat.
"As it is now I reckon I
have a pretty good set-up - compared with a bog stocker. With
new tyres and 15mm EAS adjustment - the car sits over 2" higher in std
mode (Fine for most trail work). When needed, the car
can go up another 2" + while still maintaining a comfy ride
(Over logs, water etc).
But only
leaves a couple inches of down travel thanks to std
shock. See 4th pic - front axle max height setting. I don't
know what would happen to OEM airsprings &
shockers with all wheels in the air!!??
I'll address the down
travel thing once I get tired of playing with my rear locker....."
(See page on air supply for
locker and tire inflation for more on Hardy's locker installation).
Musings on Remaining Problems and Alternative
Approaches
During the process of
arriving at the final setup Hardy is now using (detailed above), Hardy
sent in the following reports about his thoughts on further
improvements to his EAS to gain more height and travel. These are
reprinted here in case other readers have ideas on how to solve the
various problems.
"I'm having trouble finding longer travel shocks - required travel is
quite specific, so it looks as though I have to make some extension
brackets up instead. I have physically
determined that I can achieve an extra 2" axle droop both
front and back (2" at shock mounts - probably 3" at wheels) while
still using original shocks. I prefer this option anyway as
it's much cheaper.
"I may have to obtain sway bar disconnects s the sway bar
does seem like it may hinder articulation by physically hitting
the axle."
Part way through development of the Stage II system
above, Hardy also considered lifting the rear further using spacers,
and even made some up.
"Below is a picture of
1"
spacers I made for rear axle -- I had a mate use his plasma cutter for
the cut out. I
hadn't
drilled mount holes as yet - still thinking.....
The
airspring and piston is ex front axle. I
may end up using these spacers on the front. Dunno yet."
|
|
|
Spacers Hardy had made as one
method of gaining a lift (Photo shows spacer atttached to lower front
spring piston but original intention was to use it on the rear and gain
the front lift by using rear springs). |
"Rovertym
make a 2" spacer kit for SLS Discovery's. http://www.rovertym.com/slsspacers.htm.
It
confirmed I'm on the right track. They look
'canted' -- I thought
of doing this too, but discounted it as it might cause problems
under compression - mis-aligning the top of the piston out the edge of
bag. I even
tried to imagine some sort of hinged spacer to allow for the
effect of the radius arm pulling rear of airspring away from piston. But
I think a 'slinky
spacer' would be the way to go. A hollow
piston platform with an internal coil would allow the airspring and
piston
to pull away from axle under extreme droop, relying on
the 'slinky spacer' spring to relocate.
"The next
idea is to go back to basics. 2" spring spacers all round, reset the
offroad height back down a bit. Increase bumpstops by 1" or
2", then I'll aim to increase axle droop front and rear using
combination of correct length shock absorbers and my longer springs. I came across
this idea while trying to fit front shocks onto rear - they
really have a bit too much travel for the one inch spring spacers. I have to recheck their
possible fitment too - if they work.... give
rear axle 5" more down travel - less 2" for compressed size /
bumpstops.... they'll be one cheap & easy performance
enhancement!"
Like many of our Rovers, Hardy's RR is a work in progress, and these ideas may
serve as fodder for someone else's efforts.
Return to Upgrades
Return to RangeRovers.net
If you have corrections, comments or suggestions, email us.
Page revised February 1, 2012